Agenda Intel MD adds schema checks for strategic-risk briefs

Agenda Intel MD is an open-source protocol, schema set, CLI, and MCP server for validating and scoring strategic-risk agent output. The project is aimed at policy, sanctions, regulation, and geopolitical-risk agents, and it checks structure and evidence discipline rather than factual truth.

Agenda Intel MD adds schema checks for strategic-risk briefs

Agenda Intel MD is an open-source evidence and audit layer for strategic intelligence agents. The project combines a markdown protocol, JSON schemas, a command-line tool, and an MCP-compatible server to help AI systems produce strategic-risk briefs that are structured, evidence-labeled, and easier for analysts to review.

According to the project description, the toolkit is aimed at engineers building policy, sanctions, regulation, geopolitical-risk, market-risk, and strategic-intelligence agents. Its goal is to move agent output away from unsupported summaries and toward briefs that clearly state what changed, why it matters, what is backed by evidence, what remains uncertain, who gains or loses use, which scenarios are plausible, and what to watch next.

⚡ New to this?

This is a tool for checking whether an AI-generated strategic brief has the right structure and evidence labels. A schema is a set of rules for what fields a file must contain, and MCP, or Model Context Protocol, is a way for AI apps to call tools inside their workflow. For readers building or reviewing AI systems, the news is that more teams are adding formal audit layers before they trust agent output.

🦞 OpenClaw angle

If you build self-hosted agents that write briefs, wire a schema check into the generation step and fail the job when validate-brief or validate-evidence returns non-zero. Use the claim-level audit format to force every important statement to carry evidence IDs and uncertainty text, then score the result before it reaches a user or downstream agent. If you already use MCP, expose validation and scoring as tools so the agent can check itself before handing off output.

The repository is open source and can be installed from PyPI with pip install agenda-intelligence-md. It also has a pinned wheel available on GitHub for version 0.7.3.

The package ships several components. The Agenda-Intelligence.md protocol gives agents a structured reasoning workflow. JSON schemas validate brief structure, evidence packs, memory cards, lens manifests, and signal trackers. The CLI includes commands such as validate-brief, validate-evidence, score, doctor, bench, source-plan, and mcp-config.

The project also includes a real stdio MCP server, agenda-intelligence-mcp, so MCP-compatible hosts such as Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, or custom agents can call validation and scoring tools during an agent loop. According to the project, this avoids copy-pasting between systems and lets the audit layer run alongside generation rather than as a separate step.

The toolkit’s evidence policy is explicit about provenance. Claims can be tagged with categories such as [primary], [secondary], [user-provided], [inference], and [analyst-judgment], plus a freshness marker like [verify] or [stale-risk: YYYY-MM]. The repository also includes a signal lifecycle tracker for moving items through states like detected, developing, escalated, stable, resolved, and archived.

For source handling, the package includes a source-normalization skill that can turn PDF, DOCX, and URL inputs into structured source records for evidence packs. It also bundles regional and sector lenses for Central Asia and the Caspian, the Middle East, the EU, sanctions, and export controls.

The maintainers are clear about the limits. Agenda Intel MD is not a factuality verifier, not a source retriever, and not a replacement for analyst judgment. According to the project, it checks form rather than truth, and the benchmark seed is only a starting point.

The repository says the bundled baseline benchmark covers five cases: EU AI Act, EU CBAM, Red Sea shipping, sanctions routing, and BIS AI Diffusion. It reports a mean score of 87.0 out of 100, 100% schema validity, 100% evidence pack coverage, 100% claim-level audit coverage, and zero orphan evidence references. The project says those results were reproduced with python3 evals/run_benchmark.py.

The CLI is designed for CI-style use. The project shows examples of validating a brief, validating evidence, running claim audits, scoring output with or without an evidence pack, and running a structural benchmark across bundled examples. It also includes doctor to diagnose the local install and MCP tool surface.

In the package structure, the core Python code lives under src/agenda_intelligence/, with schemas, examples, analysis-bank patterns, evaluation assets, docs, and tests alongside it. The project is released under the MIT license.

Source: HN Show HN ↗

More from OpenClaw News